Comparison

Melanotan-1 vs Melanotan-2

Two melanocortin tanning peptides with different selectivity, side-effect profiles, and regulatory histories.

Summary

Melanotan-1 (the afamelanotide lineage) reached an approved implant for a rare photosensitivity disease; melanotan-2 is the unapproved community staple with broader effects and more side effects.

Key answers

How do the effects differ?

Both stimulate melanogenesis through MC1R. Melanotan-2 is less selective across melanocortin receptors, which explains its stronger tanning reputation and its extra effects: nausea, flushing, appetite suppression, and libido changes: the same pharmacology that eventually produced PT-141 (bremelanotide).

What is the regulatory status of each?

Afamelanotide, the drug form of the melanotan-1 lineage, is an approved 16 mg subcutaneous implant for erythropoietic protoporphyria. Melanotan-2 is unapproved everywhere and has drawn regulator warnings, including an FDA action against a vendor in 2016 and later TGA and Health Canada warnings about tanning products.

What schedules do community sources describe?

Both are used as loading-then-maintenance injections: commonly 250 to 500 mcg daily loading for MT-2 (around 500 mcg to 1 mg for MT-1), then weekly maintenance. Dermatology concerns center on darkening of existing moles and the unknown long-term effect of stimulating melanocytes with an unapproved drug.

Comparison matrix

Comparison matrix
DimensionMelanotan-1Melanotan-2
Overall evidence gradeBD
Evidence labelStrong human evidenceLimited human evidence
Regulatory statusVaries by product and jurisdictionNot FDA-approved for listed uses
Editorial confidenceHigh confidenceModerate confidence
Efficacy4/5 substantial1/5 limited
Safety3/5 emerging1/5 limited
Regulatory risk3/5 moderate5/5 very high
Product quality risk5/5 very high5/5 very high
Primary claim categoriesAfamelanotide alias mapping, Approved EPP photoprotection context, MC1 receptor pathway, Tanning and cosmetic claims, Unregulated melanotan product risk, Melanocortin-family comparisonUnapproved tanning-product context, Melanocortin receptor pathway, Gray-market product-quality risk, Skin and pigmentary safety concerns, Libido and performance claim context

Peptide summaries

References

  1. 1.

    FDA. Scenesse (afamelanotide) approval letter, NDA 210797 2019.

    Accessed 2026-07-18.

    FDA approval letter identifying afamelanotide (Scenesse) as an approved implant for erythropoietic protoporphyria; replaces the earlier EPP workshop slide deck (now offline) as the alias and evidence-boundary source.

  2. 2.

    FDA. Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (NOOH) Manookian, Edward 8/5/16 2016.

    Accessed 2026-06-09.

    FDA enforcement source describing Melanotan II as an unapproved new drug marketed as an injectable tanning product; used only for regulatory-risk and claim-boundary framing.

  3. 3.

    Other. Don't risk using tanning products containing melanotan 2025.

    Accessed 2026-06-09.

    Australian TGA warning source for melanotan I/II tanning products, online promotion, unapproved-product quality risk, adverse-event concerns, and advertising restrictions.

  4. 4.

    Other. Think twice before injecting peptides bought online: unauthorized products can seriously harm you 2026.

    Accessed 2026-06-09.

    Health Canada advisory naming Melanotan I and II among seized unauthorized injectable peptide drugs; used for unauthorized-product and label-reliability boundaries.