Comparison

IGF-1 LR3 vs IGF-1 DES

Two modified IGF-1 analogs sold for muscle growth with no human evidence between them.

Summary

LR3 is the long-acting version used daily; DES is the shorter, more potent version used around workouts. Neither has human trials, and both carry real hypoglycemia risk by mechanism.

Key answers

What is the actual difference?

IGF-1 LR3 has an extended half-life from its modifications, so community schedules use about 20 to 50 mcg once daily. IGF-1 DES lacks the first three amino acids, binds less to binding proteins, acts shorter and more locally, and is used around 50 to 100 mcg split into trained muscles around workouts.

Is either backed by human data?

No. The approved IGF-1 drug (mecasermin) is plain IGF-1 for severe primary deficiency; the LR3 and DES modifications popular in bodybuilding have no human clinical literature at all. Hypoglycemia is the dominant acute risk because these are potent insulin-like molecules.

What about legality and sport?

Both are unapproved for any marketed use and prohibited in sport under the WADA growth-factor category. Vials sold under these names are unverified research-market material.

Comparison matrix

Comparison matrix
DimensionIGF-1 LR3IGF-1 DES
Overall evidence gradeEE
Evidence labelEvidence unclearEvidence unclear
Regulatory statusNot FDA-approved for listed usesNot FDA-approved for listed uses
Editorial confidenceLow confidenceLow confidence
Efficacy0/5 not mapped0/5 not mapped
Safety0/5 not mapped0/5 not mapped
Regulatory risk3/5 moderate3/5 moderate
Product quality risk3/5 moderate3/5 moderate
Primary claim categoriesMuscle growth and performanceMuscle growth and performance

Peptide summaries

References

  1. 1.

    WADA. The 2026 Prohibited List 2026.

    Accessed 2026-06-08.

    WADA states that S0 non-approved substances are prohibited at all times when they have no current approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use.