Comparison

CJC-1295 DAC vs CJC-1295 no DAC

Two forms of the same GHRH-analog idea: one with a drug-affinity complex for week-long action, one without.

Summary

The DAC version trades physiologic GH pulses for convenience; the no-DAC form (Mod GRF 1-29) is the short-acting backbone used in the classic human pharmacology work and in most community stacks.

Key answers

What does the DAC actually change?

The drug-affinity complex binds albumin and extends half-life to roughly a week. Community schedules reflect that split: about 2 mg once weekly for the DAC form versus around 100 mcg one to three times daily for the no-DAC form.

Which one has human data?

Both have early human pharmacology behind them: randomized studies of CJC-1295 with DAC in healthy adults showing sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation, and older GHRH-analog work for the no-DAC backbone. Neither has controlled outcome trials for recovery, body composition, or anti-aging.

Is one clearly preferred in community use?

Community stacks favor no-DAC paired with ipamorelin, arguing daily pulses are more physiologic than the DAC's sustained elevation. That is mechanistic reasoning, not a tested comparison, and both forms appear in FDA compounding discussions and on the WADA prohibited list.

Comparison matrix

Comparison matrix
DimensionCJC-1295 DACCJC-1295 no DAC
Overall evidence gradeCE
Evidence labelLimited human evidenceEvidence unclear
Regulatory statusInvestigational / not approvedInvestigational / not approved
Editorial confidenceModerate confidenceLow confidence
Efficacy2/5 limited0/5 not mapped
Safety2/5 limited1/5 limited
Regulatory risk5/5 very high5/5 very high
Product quality risk5/5 very high5/5 very high
Primary claim categoriesHealthy-adult GH and IGF-1 pharmacology, DAC-specific identity, HIV visceral-obesity registry context, FDA compounding and product-quality risk, Eligibility and product-quality contextCJC-1295 no-DAC naming limits, Modified GRF alias disambiguation, FDA compounding and product-quality limits, Historical GHRH analog context

Peptide summaries

References

  1. 1.

    PubMed. Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GH-releasing hormone, in healthy adults 2006.

    doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1536 PMID:16352683 Accessed 2026-06-09.

    Randomized placebo-controlled healthy-adult study reporting dose-dependent GH and IGF-1 increases after subcutaneous CJC-1295 with no serious adverse reactions in that study context.

  2. 2.

    PubMed. Pulsatile secretion of growth hormone (GH) persists during continuous stimulation by CJC-1295, a long-acting GH-releasing hormone analog 2006.

    doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1702 PMID:17018654 Accessed 2026-06-09.

    Healthy-men study reporting increased trough and mean GH secretion and IGF-1 with preserved GH pulsatility one week after a single injection.

  3. 3.

    PubMed. Growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone (1-29)-NH2 and a D-Ala2 analog in normal men 1985.

    doi:10.1016/0196-9781(85)90124-x PMID:2866496 Accessed 2026-06-09.

    Older human GHRH(1-29)-NH2 and D-Ala2 analogue response source; used only as historical Modified GRF naming context, not as direct evidence for modern CJC-1295 no-DAC products.

  4. 4.

    FDA. December 4, 2024 Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) Meeting 2024.

    Accessed 2026-06-09.

    FDA briefing distinguishes DAC and non-DAC CJC-1295 forms as separate active moieties, states none of the reviewed substances are components of FDA-approved drugs, and summarizes characterization and safety concerns.

  5. 5.

    WADA. The 2026 Prohibited List: growth hormone releasing factors 2026.

    Accessed 2026-06-09.

    WADA lists CJC-1295 under prohibited growth hormone releasing factors and analogues in section S2.